Re: undefined compound chaining behavior

[Ben Abbott]

On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:20 AM, Hossein Sajjadi <address@hidden> wrote:

> <operator.png>

The logic looks buggy.

(1) You've claimed that the c++ rules for evaluation are undefined, and also 
insist that Octave should follow the c++ rules (Octave does not).  You can 
object to the ambiguity of c++, but not of Octave.

(2) Several developers have pointed out that Octave's parser has its own rules 
for evaluation. You can object that Octave uses rules that are different from 
c++, but cannot object to Octave's rules being undefined.

Ben