|
From: | Daniel J Sebald |
Subject: | Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions |
Date: | Tue, 24 Jun 2014 02:06:06 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 |
On 06/24/2014 12:01 AM, Julien Bect wrote:
An interesting reference : http://speed.julialang.org/about ?
There's even test results for Octave in the table here: http://julialang.org/Julia looks very similar to the familiar syntax we know for Octave with a few extra features for parallelism. However, I don't understand the Julia setup well enough to know how the comparison is done and how we can automate comparisons integrating Julia.
The graphics utility that Julia is using (the D3 data driven documents) sure has an impressive group of examples.
Dan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |