Re: revive compare_plot_demos

[Rik]

On 06/24/2014 08:58 AM, Andreas Weber wrote:
> Am 24.06.2014 14:38, schrieb Ben Abbott:
>> On Jun 24, 2014, at 7:38 AM, Andreas Weber <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ben,
>>> Am 21.06.2014 19:27, schrieb Ben Abbott:
>>>
>>>> I had adopted Soren's "dump_plot_demos.m" and added some features (the 
>>>> details escape me at the moment).  In any event, the link below includes 
>>>> the scripts and the output (from the last time I ran it ... about 2.5 yrs 
>>>> ago).
>>>>
>>>>    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/5x1ik04g3p1ouzj/AABr7imsXzMutM-nVi4StZc7a
>>>>
>>>> Ben
>>> Thanks for sharing. I guess the .m scripts in your dropbox are all
>>> generated from compare_plot_demos.m, dump_demos.m,
>>> html_plot_demos_template.html... but they are missing there.
>>>
>>> I this the latest version from these missing scripts?
>>> http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/demo-syntax-and-using-dump-demos-to-compare-to-ML-tp4316479p4319733.html
>>>
>> opps. You are correct.  I've done some "house-keeping" since I used these 
>> scripts last and can't locate the most recent versions (maybe I deleted 
>> them?).  However, I've attached the most recent version which remains on my 
>> computer (as a changeset).
> Thank you Ben.
> Is it okay if I apply your changeset to default and start from there?
> Remove deprecated functions, adapt to new scripts/plot/ structure and so
> on? I've also access to Matlab R2014a so I can make a compare run after
> fixing the scripts.
> -- Andy
>

I'm not Ben, but this seems like a good idea. 

Perhaps some of the functions should also be put in a private/ directory of
testfun if they don't really need to be exposed to users of run-octave?

--Rik