[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave
|
From: |
c. |
|
Subject: |
Re: globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave |
|
Date: |
Fri, 7 Nov 2014 10:14:00 +0100 |
On 6 Nov 2014, at 19:25, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> Is it necessary to allow the global prefix to be modified, or would it
> be OK to simply expect that globally installed packages are located in
> a directory under OCTAVE_HOME?
I am not sure that would work if we intend to make a relocatable .app
bundle for OSX.
an app bundle is just a folder you can move around where you like through
the finder GUI which contains all executables, libraries and data files
required for the application to run.
How would you change the value of OCTAVE_HOME when the the bundle is moved?
c.