[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave
|
From: |
c. |
|
Subject: |
Re: globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave |
|
Date: |
Sat, 8 Nov 2014 06:26:11 +0100 |
On 7 Nov 2014, at 22:24, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> I guess there will now be some work to merge the two versions because there
> have probably been changes in core Octave that are independent of the forked
> version of pkg.m.
As far as I can see JP's version is not a modified version of pkg.m but rather
a complete rewrite,
so there is not really anything to merge ...
> jwe
c.
- globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave, John W. Eaton, 2014/11/06
- Re: globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave, Ben Abbott, 2014/11/06
- Re: globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave, c., 2014/11/07
- Re: globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave, Philip Nienhuis, 2014/11/07
- Re: globally installed packages vs. relocatable Octave, Carnë Draug, 2014/11/09