Re: A case for C++11 in Octave

[c.]

On 14 Nov 2014, at 17:58, Carnë Draug <address@hidden> wrote:

> Or instead of aiming for a specific C++ standard, we could aim for the
> standard features
> implemented on at least a specific version of gcc.

what features in particular would you like to start using?

We should at least check carefully and document clearly what 
minimum version of c++/clang++/icc/XL-c++ we will be requiring. 

Version compatibility tables are available for all compilers I know,
here is the tabel for g++, for example:

https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html

c.