|
From: | Philip Nienhuis |
Subject: | Re: specfun release ? [WAS: laguerre.m functions in specfun package] |
Date: | Wed, 29 Apr 2015 23:20:17 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33 |
Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: <long snip>
Juan, if you can solve the laguerre.m issue I mentioned in my OP here I'm still prepared to make a new release (if Carnë is willing to upload it). But my suggestion to make it a temporary one until Octave 4.2.0 still stands (i.e., a dependency on Octave < 4.2.0). I think that would save all of us the most time now that Octave-4.0.0. is close.
<snip>
I updated the function. Is it ok now? It passes all the tests and has a demo.
Did you test with Octave-4.0.0-rc3 or -4 ? If yes, it should be OK.
Now, the signature is changed in a way that is closer to matlabs http://ch.mathworks.com/help/symbolic/laguerrel.html
What about the laguerre.m in devel/ subdir? That was the subject of my original question - I think there shouldn't be a devel/ subdir in an OF package.
Shall we rename it to laguerreL? Or will it be implemented in the symbolic package?
I have no opinion, sorry. Why should it be renamed? Philip
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |