octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: statistics package more suitable for nlinfit et al.? (was: Re: nlinf


From: Olaf Till
Subject: Re: statistics package more suitable for nlinfit et al.? (was: Re: nlinfit in octave)
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 08:00:33 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:29:16AM -0400, Nir Krakauer wrote:
> My view is that if the Optimization package will be required anyway,
> keeping nlinfit in it is the more user-friendly choice compared to
> introducing an extra dependency for the Statistics package.

I've committed and pushed nlinfit and the statset suite to optim.

Thanks,

Olaf

-- 
public key id EAFE0591, e.g. on x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]