[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++11 now default?
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
Re: C++11 now default? |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:46:22 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:33:07 -0500, Ben Abbott wrote:
> > On Feb 23, 2016, at 20:15, Mike Miller <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > I made a couple of small fixes and I am able to build the default branch
> > with clang 3.7 now. Octave segfaults when printing figures for the
> > manual, but no compiler errors. Many warnings to tackle another day.
>
> I'm also seeing segfaults when printing figures for the manual. I thought
> this was another Mac problem, so I hadn't mentioned it. The segfaults are
> reproducible, so if I run make several times, the manual eventually
> completed.
>
> Also, I don't have Omesa, so my crashes occur with GNUPLOT.
The segfault happens for me regardless of toolkit.
Does the following segfault for you?
graphics_toolkit gnuplot
plot (1)
findobj -not type figure -not type axes -property units
If so then we are seeing the same thing. See bug #47246.
--
mike
- Re: C++11 now default?, (continued)
- Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, Mike Miller, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/25
- Re: C++11 now default?, Ben Abbott, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?,
Mike Miller <=
- Re: C++11 now default?, Ben Abbott, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, Mike Miller, 2016/02/23
Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/25
Re: C++11 now default?, Rik, 2016/02/23