[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s
From: |
Carlo De Falco |
Subject: |
Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Apr 2016 04:54:08 +0000 |
On 8 Mar 2016, at 11:47, Carlo De Falco <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 8 Mar 2016, at 09:46, Richard Crozier <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 07/03/16 17:33, Carlo De Falco wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7 Mar 2016, at 16:44, Richard Crozier <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> Well I was thinking it is quite hard, but that might be more of reflection
>>>> of myself than the project.
>>>
>>> yes, you are right it is a non trivial project, but you should consider
>>> that the
>>> library we proposed to use as a backend already implements exactly the same
>>> algorithm as
>>> ode15s.
>>>
>>>> It seems quite hard to do a lot more than get a really good and well
>>>> tested implementation of ode15s, with all the features such as event
>>>> detection and documentation. However, maybe a lot of the code exists
>>>> already, I don't know the detail of the ode solver implementations and how
>>>> much can be reused.
>>>
>>> sundials has all that and even more, there is no need to reuse code just
>>> write a good interface.
>>> that said, I admit it is definitely not a trivial task to add yet another
>>> external dependency
>>> library to core...
>>>
>>> there will be a lot of difficulties with stuff such as writing DLD_FUNs,
>>> using mercurial, making
>>> autotools tests, etc.
>>>
>>> would you like / have time to contribute to mentoring this part of the
>>> work, if we find a good student?
>>>
>>
>> Yes I'm willing to help with the 'boilerplate' work, I am familiar with
>> autotools, mercurial, building Octave and have had a few patches accepted to
>> Octave core. I'm very motivated to get ode15s implemented in Octave.
>>
>> I'll be much more useful in fact if most of the actual numerical
>> implementation already exists and the project is mostly just making this
>> accessible in Octave. Sounds like you know jwe would be fine with the
>> dependencies. One thing I haven't done in the past is DLD_FUNs, since I
>> usually go with mex for Matlab compatibility, but happy to learn about this
>> too.
>>
>> Richard
>
>
> Great! Your help will be extremely welcome.
> I'll add you as one of the mentors on the wiki page and send you an
> invitation from the google system.
> Thanks,
> c.
Hi,
Can you please try to fill in the ranking of project proposals
in the sheet prepared by Nir here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Nf7yHO7-S-BJlr9ntqkZUQVIas4_WZC954RRT8yqAH0/edit?usp=sharing
the selection must be fnalized by 1PM UTC today, we we have 7 viable proposals
and 5 slots (+ probably one more in SoCiS).
c.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s,
Carlo De Falco <=