octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Octave for OS X (was: How to install Octave 4.0.1 on OS X Yosemite)


From: edmund ronald
Subject: Re: Octave for OS X (was: How to install Octave 4.0.1 on OS X Yosemite)
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 06:31:52 +0200



On Wednesday, June 8, 2016, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <address@hidden> wrote:
>From: edmund ronald 
>To: Ben Abbott
>Cc: Sebastian Schöps ; octave-maintainers 
>Date: 2016/6/8, Wed 12:49
>Subject: Re: Octave for OS X (was: How to install Octave 4.0.1 on OS X Yosemite)
>
>
>
>
>On Wednesday, June 8, 2016, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>On Jun 7, 2016, at 9:48 PM, edmund ronald <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>Does anyone here have any GPL-related legal, ideological  or personal objection to my code-signing an OS X binary and distributing it? 
>>>
>>>
>>>Which is the version of the GPL that applies? 
>>>
>>>
>>>BTW, as most here realize, Apple's security architecture is going to create a bunch of headaches with any native Mac distribution - it's going to be a Red Queen situation, with the Mac maintainers running to keep in place ie. keep their binary compatible as Apple's rules change.
>>>
>>>
>>>Edmund
>>>ᐧ
>>
>>Can you give us a quick explanation of “code-signing”? Any reason why we can’t do that ourselves and distribute via SourceForge?
>>
>>
>>Octave uses GPLv3.
>>
>>
>>Ben
>
>
>Hi Ben,
>
>
> I would assume you can do anything you want :)  and so can I within the limits set by the GPL, that is the beauty of free software.
> The code-signing tech is described here: https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Security/Conceptual/CodeSigningGuide/Introduction/Introduction.html
> I believe Sebastian is familiar with it, we discussed it a bit at Octconf.
> I personally feel a bit uneasy about Sourceforge, maybe because of this event: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/05/sourceforge-grabs-gimp-for-windows-account-wraps-installer-in-bundle-pushing-adware/
> A lot of people seem to be using GIthub these days, both as source and binary repository.
>
>
>Edmund

>


According to Oliver, SourceForge changes their policy towards good direction.
See:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Re-pdepe-td4676565.html#a4677297

Tatsuro  

Ah. Thank you very much for the link to that discussion.

Edmund 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]