On 02/08/2018 12:43 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
I'm not sure about the "browser" name change. I prefer the names
match what they are derived from. This is sort of how Qt is set up,
e.g., here's one hierarchy of inheritance:
QAbstractButton
QPushButton
QCommandLinkButton
This maybe makes sense for the fairly generic sort of widgets that Qt
provides. But what I'm talking about are Octave objects. The history
browser will always be something that allows users to examine the
command history, but it may not always be derived from the QtDockWidget
object. Having that in the name doesn't make sense to me. It's like
Hungarian notation. It seems like it might be a good idea until you
decide to change the type of a variable.
We could use another name than browser but I don't want to append
DockWidget just because it currently happens to be implemented using a
QtDockWidget object.