|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | Re: Deprecate tmpnam()? |
Date: | Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:58:57 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
On 03/26/2018 05:52 PM, Rik wrote:
All, I proposed deprecating tmpnam back in 2014 as it does the same thing as the Matlab function tempname which we also provide. A discussion ensued here http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Keeping-both-tmpnam-and-tempname-td4666868.html. Back then, tmpnam was used 189 times in Octave core and 29 times in OF packages. Three years later there is now only one instance of tmpnam in core, which I am just switching over. Is is reasonable to start the deprecation of tmpnam with the 4.4 release?
It's fine with me as long as all the functionality of tmpnam can be obtained using other functions.
jwe
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |