octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tested 5.0.91


From: Christian Himpe
Subject: Re: Tested 5.0.91
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:06:29 +0100

Dear Mike,

On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 20:32:37 -0800
Mike Miller <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi Christian,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 01:56:20 +0100, Christian Himpe wrote:
> > I compiled octave-5.0.91 on Ubuntu 18.04 with the self-compiled
> > library stack:
> > 
> > * OpenBLAS 0.3.5
> > * FlexiBLAS 2.0.0
> > * qrupdate 1.1.2
> > * SuiteSparse 5.4.0
> > * arpack-ng 3.7.0
> > * sundials 2.7.0  
> 
> When you run the test suite are you using FlexiBLAS with OpenBLAS
> selected? I assume so.
> 
Yes.

> Is your Ubuntu system x86-64?
> 
Yes.

> > whereas the fails are in:
> > 
> > * plot/appearance/camlookat.m (1 FAIL)
> > * specfun/gammainc.m (3 FAILs)  
> 
> In your fntests.log file, all 4 failures are because the difference is
> slightly out of the test tolerance.
> 
> I think the gammainc.m test tolerances were chosen empirically, and
> they have been increased in the past
> (https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53437).
> 
> Cc'ing Colin to comment on the camlookat.m test results and
> tolerances:
> 
> !!!!! test failed
> ASSERT errors for:  assert (dir,dir2,-2 * eps)
> 
>   Location  |  Observed  |  Expected  |  Reason
>     (2)        0.72803      0.72803      Rel err 4.5749e-16 exceeds
> tol 4.4409e-16 by 1e-17
> 

Sorry, I should have been more specific there.

Best

Christian


-- 
Christian Himpe
Computational Methods in Systems and Control Theory
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems
Sandtorstr. 1
D-39106 Magdeburg
Germany



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]