[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
HAVE_FEATURE information for BLAS and LAPACK
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
HAVE_FEATURE information for BLAS and LAPACK |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:27:43 -0700 |
All,
I just took a look at https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57042 where the
internal configuration information about Octave obtained from
__octave_config_info__.build_features returns 0 for BLAS and LAPACK.
This isn't at all true. BLAS and LAPACK are non-optional requirements and
the configure script will bail out if early if they are not present. Since
they are non-optional, one choice would be to remove them from the
build_features structure. There is no need to test for them because they
will always be there. Another simple choice would be to default these two
entries to 1 since they will always be present. I have a slight leaning
towards the first solution since I don't believe there is a reason for a
programmer to condition any of their code on HAVE_BLAS or HAVE_LAPACK.
Any thoughts?
--Rik
- HAVE_FEATURE information for BLAS and LAPACK,
Rik <=