[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bugs blocking the 6.1 release
From: |
Markus Mützel |
Subject: |
Re: Bugs blocking the 6.1 release |
Date: |
Fri, 22 May 2020 16:15:50 +0200 |
Am 16. Mai 2020 um 16:38 Uhr schrieb "John W. Eaton":
> On 5/16/20 4:58 AM, "Markus Mützel" wrote:
> > Thanks for the quick fix. I could successfully create the tarball with that
> > change (hg id 178d101fd37d).
> >
> > Cross-building the stable-octave target with MXE Octave fails with the
> > following error:
> >
> > /home/osboxes/Documents/Repositories/Octave/mxe-octave-stable/tmp-stable-octave/octave-6.0.1/libinterp/octave-value/ov-fcn-handle.cc:
> > In constructor 'octave::simple_fcn_handle::simple_fcn_handle(const
> > octave_value&, const string&)':
> > /home/osboxes/Documents/Repositories/Octave/mxe-octave-stable/tmp-stable-octave/octave-6.0.1/libinterp/octave-value/ov-fcn-handle.cc:181:28:
> > warning: declaration of 'octave_function* fcn' shadows a parameter
> > [-Wshadow]
> > 181 | octave_function *fcn = m_fcn.function_value ();
> > | ^~~
>
> [...]
>
> I'll check out the warnings. What version of GCC are you using that
> produces these warnings? I don't recall seeing them with GCC 8.
>
> > /home/osboxes/Documents/Repositories/Octave/mxe-octave-stable/tmp-stable-octave/octave-6.0.1/libinterp/octave-value/ov-fcn-handle.cc:
> > In member function 'virtual bool
> > octave_fcn_handle::load_hdf5(octave_hdf5_id, const char*)':
> > /home/osboxes/Documents/Repositories/Octave/mxe-octave-stable/tmp-stable-octave/octave-6.0.1/libinterp/octave-value/ov-fcn-handle.cc:2640:27:
> > error: cannot bind non-const lvalue reference of type 'octave_hdf5_id&'
> > {aka 'long long int&'} to an rvalue of type 'octave_hdf5_id' {aka 'long
> > long int'}
> > 2640 | if (afh->load_hdf5 (group_hid, space_hid, type_hid))
> > | ^~~~~~~~~
> > /home/osboxes/Documents/Repositories/Octave/mxe-octave-stable/tmp-stable-octave/octave-6.0.1/libinterp/octave-value/ov-fcn-handle.cc:2022:57:
> > note: initializing argument 1 of 'bool
> > octave::anonymous_fcn_handle::load_hdf5(octave_hdf5_id&, octave_hdf5_id&,
> > octave_hdf5_id&)'
> > 2022 | bool anonymous_fcn_handle::load_hdf5 (octave_hdf5_id& group_hid,
> > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
> > make[5]: *** [Makefile:20696:
> > libinterp/octave-value/liboctave_value_la-ov-fcn-handle.lo] Error 1
> >
> >
> > Some of those are warnings that I also see for native builds on Ubuntu
> > Linux. But the error about the non-const lvalue seems to be Windows
> > specific. I'm not sure why gcc doesn't mind on Linux though (maybe some
> > standard extension?).
>
> Yeah, strange. I'll try a Windows build and see if I can understand why
> that's failing.
I think I finally understand why this is failing:
For native compilations on my Linux box, hid_t is typedef'ed as int64_t. In the
version of the HDF5 headers that is included in MXE Octave, hid_t is typedef'ed
as int. Like shown in the error message, octave_hdf5_id is likely typedef'ed as
int64_t.
Thus, the types match for native builds on Linux. For Windows MXE builds, the
compiler tries to create a temporary rvalue of matching type to call load_hdf5
and fails on binding the non-const lvalue reference to the temporary rvalue.
To be honest, the error message would have been a lot more helpful if it
mentioned the type of hid_t...
I used the attached changes to fix that error and to also avoid the shadowed
variable warnings.
I'll report back when the cross-compilation has finished and I could test the
performance on Windows.
Markus
ov-fcn-handle_cross_compile.patch
Description: Binary data
- Bugs blocking the 6.1 release, John W. Eaton, 2020/05/13
- Re: Bugs blocking the 6.1 release, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2020/05/13
- Re: Bugs blocking the 6.1 release, Markus Mützel, 2020/05/14
- Re: Bugs blocking the 6.1 release, Markus Mützel, 2020/05/14
- Re: Bugs blocking the 6.1 release, John W. Eaton, 2020/05/14
- Re: Bugs blocking the 6.1 release, John W. Eaton, 2020/05/14
- Re: Bugs blocking the 6.1 release, Markus Mützel, 2020/05/16
- Re: Bugs blocking the 6.1 release, John W. Eaton, 2020/05/16
- Re: Bugs blocking the 6.1 release, Markus Mützel, 2020/05/16
- Re: Bugs blocking the 6.1 release,
Markus Mützel <=
- Re: Bugs blocking the 6.1 release, Markus Mützel, 2020/05/23
Re: Bugs blocking the 6.1 release, Daniel J Sebald, 2020/05/15
Re: Bugs blocking the 6.1 release, Andrew Janke, 2020/05/19