Re: clang static analysis

[John W. Eaton]

On 10/13/20 2:11 PM, Markus Mützel wrote:
> Am 02. Oktober 2020 um 22:10 Uhr schrieb "Dmitri A. Sergatskov":
> > I ran a clang-11 static analysis on 2219027f5bd4 (stable).
> > Results are available at:
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/13Qz6svSS4yEwffpNFkd7X-_wQN7ykLky/view?usp=sharing
>   
> I pushed a changeset here that hopefully avoids the detected "bad free":
> https://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/02f0649f43d7

I suppose that change is OK, but I don't think the reference count for 
those nil_rep objects can ever be zero, so it seems to me that the 
warning could be safely ignored.

jwe