[Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #9712] [octave forge] (image) new function bwpack

[Carnë Draug]

Follow-up Comment #6, patch #9712 (project octave):

I'm not sure bitpack does the right thing. Its documentation says that the
bits come in increasing order of significance but then they also say that x(1)
is bit 0 which will not be the least significant bit for uint32 on big-endian.
 Also, looking at the code, seems that they pack the values one byte at a time
so I don't think the endianess is used.  If you have a big-endian machine
running Octave, can you test it?

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?9712>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/