[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #10008] [octave forge] (statistics) Add fu

From: anonymous
Subject: [Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #10008] [octave forge] (statistics) Add function inconsistent
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2021 16:56:33 -0500 (EST)
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0

Follow-up Comment #3, patch #10008 (project octave):

About the code formatting: no problem. I have just found this:
https://wiki.octave.org/Octave_style_guide .

About the nested function: I used the nested function exactly to avoid the
duplication of data. I think that Octave creates a copy of the input arguments
every time the function is called, which, for a recursive function, means many
times at once. I can relocate it inside the main, if you think it will make it
more readable.

About the dataset: it is the most famous Iris dataset (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iris_flower_data_set ) published by Fisher in
1936. It is included in R and scikit-learn (a BSD licenced package for Python)
and it is, as far as I know, in public domain. However I am going to include a
reference to the UCI Machine Learning Repository in the file, just to make its
provenance clear.

I think that I will be able to upload the updated versions in a few days.


Reply to this item at:


  Message sent via Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]