openexr-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Openexr-devel] Openexr-devel Digest, Vol 104, Issue 5


From: ole kristensen
Subject: Re: [Openexr-devel] Openexr-devel Digest, Vol 104, Issue 5
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:15:49 -0200

+1 for "exr"

for workflow-specific files it's easy to use a sort of dot notation that will 
enable all kinds of specific naming schemes without diluting the exr suffix. 

E.g.  img_000023.deeperthantherest.exr 

- this is enough to filter using searches and command lines, even file open 
boxes, and only get and affect *.deeperthantherest.exr 

Best / o

Den 18/07/2012 kl. 19.12 skrev Jeremy Selan:

>> Jonathan Litt wrote...
>> So now there will be three extensions for the same file format that all just 
>> serve as hints, but that make no difference to reader programs?
> 
> +1 for sticking with ".exr" for all 2.0 spec files.
> 
> -- Jeremy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openexr-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]