[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Pan-devel] Re: libgnet1-dev ?

From: Matthias Urlichs
Subject: [Pan-devel] Re: libgnet1-dev ?
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 08:01:15 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.5.1


Takuo KITAME wrote:
> Matthias Urlichs:
> > => Please rename the former libgnet-dev (version 1.1.7) to libgnet1-dev,
> > and upload it to sid.
> No. Pan should be compiled against (ported to) libgnet2.

You might want to take that up with the pan people, then.
(Cc'd to pan-devel.).

RE: [Pan-devel] ANN: Pan 0.13.96 "You appear to be in death,comrade."

From: <address@hidden>
To:  "Discussions of Pan source code hacking." <address@hidden>
CC: "Matthias Urlichs" <address@hidden>
Date: 2003-05-19 10:32

Then we should report that Debian does not do the proper support. For RPM 
based systems, gnet-1.x.x and gnet2-2.x.x packages do exist now, so they can 
coexist. This is new since some time. The author of the gnet lib accepted my 
patch to let the rpm to be called gnet2-2.x.x instead of gent-2.x.x to make 
this possible.

So you might contact the Debian gnet packager and explain that Debian should 
have both the latest gnet-1.x.x and latest gnet2-2.x.x packages.

Matthias Urlichs   |   {M:U} IT Design @   |  address@hidden
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. |
MODULO prep. Except for.  From mathematical terminology: one can
   consider saying that 4=22 "except for the 9's" (4=22 mod 9).
   "Well, LISP seems to work okay now, modulo that GC bug."
                                -- From the AI Hackers' Dictionary

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]