[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] blooper on pan.rebelbase.com
|
From: |
John J. LeMay Jr. |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] blooper on pan.rebelbase.com |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:54:16 -0400 |
** Reply to message from Søren Boll Overgaard <address@hidden> on 23 Sep 2002
17:36:06 +0200
> AFAIK, putting an apostrophe is short for "pan is website", which is not
> what I meant.
Only sometimes. In this case the apostrophe is used to show ownership. The
website "belongs" to pan, at least gramatically. Without the apostrophe "pans"
becomes a plural - as in more than one pan - not what you wanted either!
--
John LeMay
Senior Enterprise Consultant
NJMC | http://www.njmc.com | Phone 732-785-2525
Specializing in Microsoft and Unix based solutions
- [Pan-users] blooper on pan.rebelbase.com, Søren Boll Overgaard, 2002/09/23
- Re: [Pan-users] blooper on pan.rebelbase.com, gaw zay, 2002/09/23
- [OT] Re: [Pan-users] blooper on pan.rebelbase.com, Colin Leroy, 2002/09/23
- Re: [Pan-users] blooper on pan.rebelbase.com, gaw zay, 2002/09/23
- Re: [Pan-users] blooper on pan.rebelbase.com, Brian Morrison, 2002/09/23
- Re: [Pan-users] blooper on pan.rebelbase.com, gaw zay, 2002/09/23
- Re: [Pan-users] blooper on pan.rebelbase.com, Toby Inkster, 2002/09/23
- Re: [Pan-users] blooper on pan.rebelbase.com, John LeMay, 2002/09/23
- Re: [Pan-users] blooper on pan.rebelbase.com, Jeff Vian, 2002/09/23
- Re: [Pan-users] blooper on pan.rebelbase.com, John LeMay, 2002/09/23