Re: [Pan-users] Re: 0.129 - a few minor issues

[Jim Henderson]

Seems to be related to the number of headers in the group - I had
forgotten to set the purge for the server, so I had messages going
back several years.

Unlike your issue, I'm not seeing the processor utilization spike - it
could just be the raw number of headers having to be sorted each time
that was throwing it off.

But I'll poke through the open bugs and see if any of the issues I've
run into are in there - I'd forgotten that Charles had set this up to
track bugs.

Jim

On 5/10/07, SciFi <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 19:05:38 +0000, Jim Henderson wrote:
> >
> > One other thing that I had forgotten to mention - the download
> > performance is AWESOME (as I knew it was in these newer builds), but
> > I've had points where Pan totally seizes (it eventually does come back
> > to life, but while it's stuck it's seemingly hung) when downloading
> > groups or switching into a group that has many tens of thousands of
> > headers in it.
>
> I opened this bug:
> <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430628>
> There are a few others depending on exact scenario.
> Please check bugzilla and chime-in there on which ones may be
> affecting you.  It's a sure way to "vote" for which bugs are,
> ummm, bugging most ppl.  ;)
>
> > [...]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pan-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users