[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: 0.129 - a few minor issues
From: |
Jim Henderson |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: 0.129 - a few minor issues |
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2007 15:54:22 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.129 (Benson & Hedges Moscow Gold) |
On Fri, 11 May 2007 05:16:21 +0000, Duncan wrote:
> Please don't top post. It messes up quote context. There's a reason
> pan warns about it. Please respect that on the pan list, even if you
> top post elsewhere.
Sorry, I usually do, and in fact with this particular reply, I originally
nuked all the quotes and then thought better of it....That's what I get
for using the e-mail interface rather than the gmane interface. ;-)
> Old-pan was fully multithreaded. This increased performance some and
> [...]
Thanks for this great explanation of the differences between old and new
pan - that really helps.
> As for this new issue, bottlenecking on loading a group...
>
> * If you have download new headers when entering group set, you'll see
> more of a slowdown. Try turning that off and triggering your header
> downloads only manually. That should help.
Not turned on - I have it set to pull new headers at startup, otherwise
just when I hit Shift+A (still getting used to that instead of CTRL+SHIFT
+U).
> * pan now message-threads dynamically as it gets headers, [...]
OK, that explains why with a large number of headers there was a bit of a
slowdown upon entering the group. Now that I've pruned back the headers
(one group in particular has about 650,000 messages in it and was clearly
showing the issue)
> * As mentioned above, I'm not been following the decode-and-save multi-
> threading very closely, as I don't have the issue the way I do things,
> but I'm not sure if it has been merged into trunk or is still being
> tested outside of trunk. If it hasn't been merged to trunk yet, you'll
> see slowdowns during decode and save, and thus be able to avoid them by
> using my technique of downloading to cache first (while working on
> something else, or sleeping/working/shopping/whatever), then coming back
> when everything's in local cache to do your actual sorting and saving of
> attachments to disk. You'll need to increase your cache size, but I
> cover that in other posts.
I use pan primarily for reading text-only newsgroups, so decode-and-save
isn't an issue for me.
Jim
[Pan-users] Re: 0.129 - a few minor issues, Duncan, 2007/05/11
[Pan-users] Re: 0.129 - a few minor issues, Duncan, 2007/05/11