[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Here's an odd one : conditional plonk??
From: |
Beartooth |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Here's an odd one : conditional plonk?? |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:26:10 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.129 (Benson & Hedges Moscow Gold) |
I've just made an odd discovery -- one of the lesser lights (but still a
highly technoid participant) on what could be my most important usenet
group (other than this one) turns out to know what I mean and why I ask
my questions, better than I do.
He is quite sure I ask deliberately obscurantist questions in order to
make trouble.
He boasts of his offended (and calculatedly offensive) replies to a
recent question -- rousing one of the very few flame wars I have seen in
that group, if not the only one. (Others have flamed him; I've been off
usenet for days, and have only discovered all this now.)
I could of course plonk him, and may have to.
But he doesn't treat all posters that way, only some, chosen I have no
idea how. To others he does sometimes return answers I may want to see.
Would it be feasible to plonk his posts if and only if they are either
replies to mine, or comments in threads I start?
Or would I end up spending weeks trying to construct such a filter, and
failing in the end anyway?
He does have an odd-looking name -- odd in the sense that it seems (to
me, anyway) to fall etymologically between two languages, as if some
forbear had adapted it from one to the other -- but I'm sure to forget
*why* I've started finding that name noticeable ...
--
Beartooth Staffwright, PhD, Neo-Redneck Linux Convert
Remember I know precious little of what I am talking about.
- [Pan-users] Here's an odd one : conditional plonk??,
Beartooth <=