Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan2 - The bits I really miss

[Steven Ellis]

Frank Tabor wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:47:10 +0200, Per Hedeland wrote:
>
>   
>> Steven Ellis <address@hidden> wrote:
>>     
>>> For the most part it is a great improvement over the old Pan. NBZ
>>> support and the better memory footprint alone are awesome, but I do have
>>> a couple of niggles.
>>>
>>> 1. Articles aren't marked as read when downloaded.
>>>       
>> Nor should they be - surely old-pan didn't do that? Or maybe you mean
>> "when saved"? If so it seems they are in 0.131.
>>
>> --Per Hedeland
>>     
>
> I believe he means filtered articles.
>
>   
Ok to clarify, I mean saved. I select a bunch of articles and select
save to disk. They don't get marked as read as they are saved, in older
Pan 1.x versions they did


Steve