RE: [Pan-users] Re: Pan2 - The bits I really miss

[Travis]

address@hidden wrote:
> Frank Tabor wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:47:10 +0200, Per Hedeland wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Steven Ellis <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> For the most part it is a great improvement over the old Pan. NBZ
>>>> support and the better memory footprint alone are awesome, but I
>>>> do have a couple of niggles.
>>>>
>>>> 1. Articles aren't marked as read when downloaded.
>>>>
>>> Nor should they be - surely old-pan didn't do that? Or maybe you
>>> mean "when saved"? If so it seems they are in 0.131.
>>>
>>> --Per Hedeland
>>>
>>
>> I believe he means filtered articles.
>>
>>
> Ok to clarify, I mean saved. I select a bunch of articles and select
> save to disk. They don't get marked as read as they are
> saved, in older
> Pan 1.x versions they did
>
>
> Steve

When I download and save articles using Pan 0.131 they are marked read.  They 
change from bold to not bold anyway.
-- 

Travis in Shoreline Washington