[Pan-users] Re: Filtering unusable slow

[Frederik Himpe]

On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:29:57 +0000, Greg Lee wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:01:59 +0000, Frederik Himpe wrote:
> 
>> I am using x86_64 bit Linux on an Athlon 64 3500.
>> 
>> Any idea how I could debug this?
> 
> No, but I do see all these problems, and I'm also using x86_64 Linux. 
> Before I started using Pan, I was using Tin, which is considerably worse
> than Pan at doing comparable things.  Also, Tin would use all my
> system's memory, which Pan does not do.

I cannot really imagine how another application can be still be 
"considerably worse" than this. I just tried filtering for CFS in one 
month of linux kernel mailing list, and I killed it again after several 
minutes of 100% CPU time. Pan has become completely unusable for me now: 
it was certainly not like that before, otherwise I would never used it for 
months without noticing and complaining... Could it be a regression in 
0.132?

-- 
Frederik Himpe