[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy
From: |
Greg Lee |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:50:17 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:07:14 +0000, walt wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:39:25 -0400, Dave Chand wrote:
>
>> On Oct 6, 2007, at 6:58 PM, Greg Lee wrote:
>>
>>> I looked at some other 1 part images in this same newsgroup and found
>>> that all those with byte size <= 369052 displayed correctly, but all
>>> those with byte size >= 369361 displayed incorrectly...
>
>> I have been experimenting with gdk-pixbuf. What I find is the
>> following: in the file gtk+2.12.x/gdk-pixbuf/io-jpeg.c there is the
>> statement #define JPEG_PROG_BUF_SIZE 65536
>> if you change its value to something significantly higher, such as
>> #JPEG_PROG_BUF_SIZE 500000
>> then it seems the decoding problems go away.
>
> I just sent this question to Matthias Clasen, who increased that number
> from 4096 back in 2002. It seems that a pixbuf sets an arbitrary size
> limit on how much data can be loaded in a single chunk. The real
> question is whether that limit is intentional or merely a bug.
>
> Meanwhile, Brian Downing posted a patch to the pan bugreport:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=96917&action=view
>
> His patch explicitly limits the amount of data Pan sends in one chunk,
> and this is the correct fix at least until we know if this size problem
> is a gdk bug or not.
I tried viewing an 8.5M jpeg using Dave's gtk+ patch
and it did not display correctly. Also, I increased
JPEG_PROG_BUF_SIZE further to 1000000, but it still
didn't work right. Then I tried Brian Downing's patch
on the SVN 324 version of pan2, and that worked fine for
the large jpeg.
I don't think this is going to surprise anyone, but I
thought you might like confirmation.
--
Greg
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, (continued)
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, Graham, 2007/10/20
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, stevem, 2007/10/20
- [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, Greg Lee, 2007/10/20
- [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, walt, 2007/10/20
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, Dave Chand, 2007/10/20
- [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, Greg Lee, 2007/10/20
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, stevem, 2007/10/20
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, stevem, 2007/10/20
- [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, walt, 2007/10/20
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, stevem, 2007/10/21
- [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy,
Greg Lee <=
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, Darren Albers, 2007/10/21
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, Evan Morris, 2007/10/22
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, Darren Albers, 2007/10/22
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, Dave Chand, 2007/10/24
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, Travis, 2007/10/06
- [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, Matthew Whitworth, 2007/10/10
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Previews gone screwy, Dave Chand, 2007/10/04