[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:50:41 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
Keith Richie <address@hidden>
posted address@hidden, excerpted below, on Mon, 24 Mar 2008
18:50:25 +0000:
> Upgraded to gcc4.3 today on Arch 64bit. Copy, pasted and applied the
> undiluted patch, everything went well from a fresh svn check out.
Not so lucky here.
First, gentoo's epatch (package managed patching) choked on the first two
entries... to the same place of the same file. I combined them into one,
and it applied fine.
However, that wasn't the only issue, tho the other isn't gcc 4.3 related
I don't think. glib 2.16 appears to be a missing function (g_assert)
that pan wants from glib. It was in glib 2.14 (I just redownloaded and
checked the sources for 2.14.6), but not the 2.16(.1) I have installed
here.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524620
I'll probably revert to glib 2.14.x here shortly.
Meanwhile, pan compiled against 2.14.x as I had it installed before the
update seems to work fine against glib 2.16.1. I suppose it just hasn't
hit the assert yet. Either that or it didn't use it six months or
whatever ago when I last successfully compiled. But I doubt that as
Charles hasn't been too active on pan lately, so I expect that dependency
has been there for awhile.
BTW, I didn't see the gcc 4.3 pan patches bugged yet when I filed the
above, so I went ahead and bugged it as:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524625
> I didn't thoroughly test this build out. But I am posting from the
> freshly installed package, browsed a few other Gmane lists, thanks to
> you btw. I had never heard of Gmane before I read it in one of your
> posts.
It's cool, isn't it? =8^) No more filling up the mailbox (or gmailbox
either) just to follow a few lists! I don't know why folks use lists
anyway. That's what newsgroups are for! =8^) Save the mailbox for the
personal/work/whatever mail (and spam).
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
- [Pan-users] Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/22
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/22
- Re: [Pan-users] Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Rhialto, 2008/03/22
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Keith Richie, 2008/03/23
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/23
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Keith Richie, 2008/03/24
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?,
Duncan <=
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Daniel Rahn, 2008/03/27
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/27
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/27
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Daniel Rahn, 2008/03/27
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/27
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/28
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Daniel Rahn, 2008/03/29
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/29
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Daniel Rahn, 2008/03/29
- [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?, Duncan, 2008/03/29