[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Connections [Is it hiding a security hole?]
From: |
Per Hedeland |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Connections [Is it hiding a security hole?] |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:11:20 +0200 (CEST) |
Duncan <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>Per Hedeland <address@hidden> posted
>address@hidden, excerpted below, on Sun,
>17 Aug 2008 12:38:46 +0200:
>
>> I seem
>> to recall that you can end up with a number of files in ~/.pan2 being
>> zero size if the file system it's in happens to be full at an
>> inopportune moment
>
>The obvious take-away is not to let your filesystems get full!
Yeah, kind of beside my point though - Pan should be able to avoid any
badness happening with the write-new-and-rename technique that it is
apparently using. (And I have no hard evidence to the contrary...)
--Per
[Pan-users] Re: Connections [Is it hiding a security hole?], Duncan, 2008/08/16