[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Ba
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering" |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:11:09 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) |
Beso <address@hidden> posted
address@hidden, excerpted
below, on Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:06:13 +0200:
> this might mean quite a big trouble with klibido too...
Indeed... and probably thunderbird and claws and knode and... and...
BTW, "long" is 32-bit on x86_64 too, right? Or is it 64-bit? I know the
addresses are 64-bit, but if I'm not mistaken, one of the porting issues
was that a lot of software expected memory addresses to be unsigned long
and on 64-bit, they're not, but rather unsigned long long, or /something/
like that. Did I get it right? And plain int, is that 16-bit, or 32?
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
- [Pan-users] GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", SciFi, 2008/08/25
- [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Duncan, 2008/08/25
- [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Duncan, 2008/08/25
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Beso, 2008/08/25
- [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering",
Duncan <=
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", CSV4ME2, 2008/08/25
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Beso, 2008/08/25
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Rhialto, 2008/08/25
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", CSV4ME2, 2008/08/25
- [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Duncan, 2008/08/26
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Zan Lynx, 2008/08/25
- [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Duncan, 2008/08/25
Re: [Pan-users] GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", K. Haley, 2008/08/27