[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bi
From: |
CSV4ME2 |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering" |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:01:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
On Monday 25 August 2008, Rhialto wrote:
> On Mon 25 Aug 2008 at 17:31:13 +0200, CSV4ME2 wrote:
> > run this litle c file thru your compiler, gcc -o size size.c
> > and you will know!
>
> On NetBSD/amd64:
>
> char = 8 bits
> unsigned char = 8 bits
> int = 32 bits
> unsigned int = 32 bits
> short = 16 bits
> unsigned short = 16 bits
> long = 64 bits
> unsigned long = 64 bits
> long long = 64 bits
> unsigned long long = 64 bits
> float = 32 bits
> double = 64 bits
> long double = 128 bits
>
> -Olaf.
On linux/IA32 only the long's (32) and long doubles (96) differ in size
C
Cetero censeo vista delendum esse.
- [Pan-users] GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", SciFi, 2008/08/25
- [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Duncan, 2008/08/25
- [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Duncan, 2008/08/25
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Beso, 2008/08/25
- [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Duncan, 2008/08/25
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", CSV4ME2, 2008/08/25
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Beso, 2008/08/25
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Rhialto, 2008/08/25
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering",
CSV4ME2 <=
- [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Duncan, 2008/08/26
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Zan Lynx, 2008/08/25
- [Pan-users] Re: GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", Duncan, 2008/08/25
Re: [Pan-users] GigaNews warns "Usenet Growth Reveals Need for 64-bit Based Article Numbering", K. Haley, 2008/08/27