[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: posting server according to the group one?
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: posting server according to the group one? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 May 2009 01:58:47 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) |
Beartooth <address@hidden> posted
address@hidden, excerpted below, on Mon, 25 May 2009
15:41:25 +0000:
> I'm glad this came up; I've been getting lots of irritating cautions
> saying the server didn't carry the group, and having to deal with them
> piecemeal. It turned out almost all were set to Gmane, for some reason.
Likely, your first profile was set to gmane, and the first profile's the
default, so that's what got used until you set something different.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
- [Pan-users] Re: posting server according to the group one?, (continued)
- [Pan-users] Re: posting server according to the group one?, Duncan, 2009/05/25
- [Pan-users] Re: posting server according to the group one?, Matej Cepl, 2009/05/26
- [Pan-users] Re: posting server according to the group one?, Duncan, 2009/05/26
- [Pan-users] Re: posting server according to the group one?, Matej Cepl, 2009/05/26
- [Pan-users] Re: posting server according to the group one?, Duncan, 2009/05/26
- [Pan-users] Re: posting server according to the group one?, Duncan, 2009/05/28
[Pan-users] Re: posting server according to the group one?, Beartooth, 2009/05/25
- [Pan-users] Re: posting server according to the group one?,
Duncan <=