Re: [Pan-users] Re: a little something for the pan heads

[Travis]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "walt" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 17:33 PM
Subject: [Pan-users] Re: a little something for the pan heads


> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:17:56 -0700, Travis wrote:
> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "walt" <address@hidden> To:
>> <address@hidden> Sent: Tuesday, June
>> 23, 2009 17:14 PM Subject: [Pan-users] Re: a little something for the
>> pan heads
>> 
>> 
>>> As we used to say back in the day, "Wow, psychedelic, man!"
>> 
>> <snip>
>> 
>> Maybe it is because he sends his messages as attachments.
> 
> Good point, Travis.  Actually it's not his replies that are attachments,
> it's his digital GPG signatures, and I believe that pan is indeed getting
> confused by that.  Here are the error messages from pan/git, which do not
> appear when I use pan/svn:
> 
> (pan:10643): gmime-CRITICAL **: g_mime_object_get_content_type: assertion 
> `GMIME_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
> 
> (pan:10643): gmime-CRITICAL **: g_mime_content_type_is_type: assertion 
> `GMIME_IS_CONTENT_TYPE (mime_type)' failed
> 
> (pan:10643): gmime-CRITICAL **: g_mime_multipart_insert: assertion 
> `GMIME_IS_OBJECT (part)' failed
> 
> (pan:10643): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT 
> (object)' failed

His very first message came through normally to me but the next two were 
attachments as was his sig.

-- 
Travis in Shoreline Washington