Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA

[Ron Johnson]

On 07/03/2011 10:27 AM, Heinrich Mueller wrote:
> On 07/03/11 13:03, Duncan wrote:
> > Looking at HMueller's git logs, I'm guessing he had no clue on pan's
> > history and GNKSA when he did the following commit (log excerpt, there
> > was more to the commit but this is the pertinent part for us):
[snip]
> > But I DO feel reasonably strongly that if we decide to dump it, we ask
> > PKovar to go ahead and remove that GNKSA seal and claim from the site
> > right away. If we're not compliant and we know it, better to face up to
> > it than to wait for someone to test pan and ask that we remove the seal.
> > (Whether there's a legal remedy or not shouldn't matter. Either we're
> > compliant or we're not, and it's pan's integrity as much as the GNKSA's
> > at stake if we're simply misrepresenting the case.)
> >
> > Someone else's turn, now. =:^)
> I'll revert that. Sorry about that, I didn't know.

It's my experience that 8 connections more than swamps a connection.

So, I'm of the opinion that "4 connections max" is as out-dated as a 
Pentium Pro w/ 32 MB RAM.

--
"Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure
the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally
corrupt."
Samuel Adams, essay in The Public Advertiser, 1749