[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Airframe Servo Definitions

From: Matthew Currie
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Airframe Servo Definitions
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:49:00 +0000

Thanks anton/martin, this is exactly what I was expecting to hear.  There must 
be another explanation for my current problem.  I will tinker further.


Matthew Currie
Mobile: 250-755-6998
Sent from a BlackBerry device    

-----Original Message-----
From: Pascal Brisset <address@hidden>

Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:15:57 
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Airframe Servo Definitions

Matthew Currie wrote:
>  Quick question about the airframe file.  I configured my radio
> properly and can easily switch the manual/auto1/auto2 modes.  The
> servos appear to be driving hard in one direction (the same) and
> binding hard so I need to shut it down quick.  Let it be noted I do
> not have IR sensors plugged in but I did not figure it would matter
> for manual mode (does it?).
 Infrared information is not used in MANUAL mode. So it is the mode you
want to use to test the servos.

>   What I want to double check is the servo section of the XML file. Is
> the order important here?  What does the no="N" argument mean?
 No the order is not meaningful. As answered by Anton, only the "no"
attribute is used. no 0 corresponds to plug S0 on the board.

>   After I nail this I should be flight worthy.  Thanks for all the
> help to this point.
> Regards,
> Matthew Currie
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden

Paparazzi-devel mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]