[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Possible FTDI Fixes (Felix)

From: Stephen L Hulme
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Possible FTDI Fixes (Felix)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:31:49 +1300

Dear Felix
Thank you very much for your response.
Unfortunately I am no wiser after much file searching
and premature balding.
Is there any chance of a 'HOW TO', much like the one
already posted in the Booz section of the Wiki for the
--js_dev <joystick device>?  
Felix Ruess, wrote on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:04:41 +0100
Hi Stephen,

currently the booz sim does not use the flight plans but rc_scripts as
control inputs. That is convenient for testing control and filters.
You can also control it by joystick using the --js_dev <joystick
device> option of the simulator.

Cheers, Felix

On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Stephen L Hulme <address@hidden> wrote:
> Dear Felix
> I have no problems compiling: "make AIRCRAFT=BOOZ2_A1 clean_ac sim" as
> detailed here:
>; and following the instructions to view
> the tuning changes in flightgear.
> Noticeably, the instruction set works well when the flight plan for
> /sw/conf/conf.xml/~BOOZ2_A1Âis dummy.xml.
> And yet I now see the default flight plan setting is booz_test_2.xml for AC:
> BOOZ2_A1.
> Can I run thisÂflight plan conf set up in flightgear with a joystick
> ifÂcertain instruction parameters are changed?
> Regards
> Stephen
> Felix Ruess wrote: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 17:36:58 +0100
> Hi Mohammed,
> seems like the signal definitions are not found. I included signal.h
> in nps_main.c wich was missing (strangely it still worked for me).
> Please do a svn update to get the latest code and let me know if it works.
> Cheers, Felix

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]