[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] custom autopilots

From: Gareth Roberts
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] custom autopilots
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:58:54 -0000
User-agent: Opera Mail/11.00 (Linux)


If you are looking at using an external board anyway how about the traditional Tiny? It should be possible to alter the code so you can control flight at a higher level via the serial port from a connected linux board computer? You could then poll the tiny for GPS information and all the peripheral attachments you need are already there.


On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:50:14 -0000, Maikel Punie <address@hidden> wrote:

maybe i should have a look at those boards then,

any sugestion on what board? since i have no idea what board to use.
about the gps: it supports nmea or SirfBinary format, but it seems that the
sirf binary format is not supported,
What about the imu on i2c should it be possible to integrate that one?


On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 16:38, Felix Ruess <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi Maikel,

What limitations do you see? Any hw/technical limitations or is this more
concerned with availability?\

buying another board an all new hardware,
we already have all the hardware (except the failsafe rc part)

so if we are going with a paparazzi board we will need to drop all out
hardware and start over, or is there a possibility to integrate our own
modem, gps servo controller and stuff with the paparazzi boards?

Of course you can integrate your modem and GPS with paparazzi.
- Modem should be trivial (probably nothing to be done here at all as long as your modems can provide a transparent, serial-like, link and don't need
any fancy in-the-air configuration).
- GPS should not be a really big deal either (although the paparazzi NMEA parser is not really good and nobody uses it afaik). So you would probably want to have a look at the parser and make sure it works always and does not hang up on unexpected packets. NMEA is not really nice in my (and a lot of other peoples) opinion anyway.... but that is not the point here of course. - Your servo controller you would very likely not need at all, since that
is already directly on the paparazzi boards.

Nevertheless, personally I think it would be nice to have support to run
all the paparazzi stuff in linux userland. That being said, I don't think this is a very good idea in a lot of cases. (You loose tight control over
timing, you should probably use a RT linux, etc.)
Imho it often makes more sense do do the sensor interfacing and fast
estimation/control loops directly on a dedicated board and only do higher level (navigation, payload, perception, etc.) on a (especially when it is a
non-realtime) linux board.

Cheers, Felix

Paparazzi-devel mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]