[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Luftboot question

From: Sergej Krukouski
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Luftboot question
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:08:29 +0200

Hi guys!


Yes, I think the solution of the bootloader for lpc21 is the best, that is why imho it will be also useful for an STM devices.

I don’t think its really necessary to add something to the airborne code, the “power on” bootloader is really sufficient.

However my current update doesn’t switch to the main code after upload, the USB must be disconnected and the power recycled.

But I think It’s already a lot more comfortable.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]