[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Paparazzi-devel] adc injected vs regular chanels

From: Chris
Subject: [Paparazzi-devel] adc injected vs regular chanels
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 22:36:43 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7

For anyone that might know:
Is there any particular reason (timing, flexibility, etc) that makes the paparazzi stm32 code to use injected channels (max 4 for each adc converter) for the adc and not the regular adc conversion method (scan etc)?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]