[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] adc injected vs regular channels

From: Chris
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] adc injected vs regular channels
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 22:03:36 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7

Hi Gautier!
No i rather don't not because i don't want to, but because i will mess things up :-D I do have time as i am on vacations (at home, no money for anything...) but i am sure that i will complicate things... I just asked out of curiocity and because i know that the paparazzi code is really very well thought out,
everything is done the way it is done for a very good reason.
Injected channels are working well for me and i just finished implementing ADC2 and ADC3 so someone
can use 12 adc channels on an stm32f4 but i haven't tested it yet.
ADC3 has it's pins mostly on port F so there are some more free pins on higher count packages. I really don't understand (i am not a stm32 guru, far from it) why it helps having 3 adcs when most of their channels are placed on common pins as it happens mostly for ADC1 and ADC2.

On 08/02/2013 03:30 PM, address@hidden wrote:
I'm working on the regular adc implementation for the F4. It is not on
github yet, but if you really want to work on it, I can share it.
Otherwise, just wait a little bit, it's on the todo list...

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]