paperclips-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Paperclips-discuss] New startup switch


From: ralhan
Subject: RE: [Paperclips-discuss] New startup switch
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 23:53:01 +0530

hi ,
my feeling are.

can we follow what apache prints in same format with things changed
relevantly for servlet engine.
like page accessed with servlet accessed sort of thing.
this will help in two ways.
it will help people reuse there scripts for log analysing with litte change.
i remember filtering tomcat log when i had to write for myself was bit pain
as i had to write
different one from what i had with apache.

if u need help on that then i can help as i have bit fair understanding of
apache log formats.

let us have engine now fast as i am dying to use it in my new project where
in design we are already putting servlet filters during design.
regards
ralhan

*******************************************
LIFE IS NOT FAIR and WINNING IS MY BIRTH RIGHT.
*******************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of Nic Ferrier
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 11:32 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: [Paperclips-discuss] New startup switch


There's now a new startup switch:

  --log-webhits

This turns on automatic binding of the weblog filter, thus it gives
you decent logging of what's going in.

The weblog filter doesn't output the necessary info yet.

Are there any views about what info it should output and in what
order?


My Zeus weblogs are this:

205.188.208.38 - - [18/Jul/2001:00:04:11 +0100] "GET /gnupaperclips
HTTP/1.0" 301 349 "http://some-referrer"; "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible;
MSIE 5.5; AOL 6.0; Windows 95)"

Which seems to be:

- client IP
- date
- request string
- response code
- content length
- client referrer
- client UA string

Are all these necessary?

What about having the session-id in there?

Does the request string need to have everything on it, including any
query?

Could the request string perhaps be truncated?


Nic

_______________________________________________
Paperclips-discuss mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paperclips-discuss




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]