Re: Running >10 jobs in parallel on the same remote machine

[Ole Tange]

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Thomas Sattler
<sattler@med.uni-frankfurt.de> wrote:

> Even so I'm still unhappy with the idea of "one separate
> ssh login per job". How about letting parallel doing the
> multiplexing on its own, running a shell or perl on the
> remote host to spawn the jobs?

I do not see how that would be possible. How would you implement
--transfer and --return?

I believe it may also make it harder to determine whether a job
failed, and thus make it harder to do --retries and --halt correctly.

/Ole