[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New bug
Re: New bug
Tue, 07 Jul 2020 20:47:33 +0000
Sorry about the radio silence for the past month.
Thank you Shlomi. I agree with your mixed feelings of Debian and am personally
not surprised by the delay in release.
I've pulled down version 20200622 as requested and reran the exact same command.
It exits with the same error:
* The version number: 20200622
* The bugid: Less than 1 byte memory free
Please let me know how I can help.
All the best,
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Sunday, June 7, 2020 3:49 AM, Shlomi Fish <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hi Evan!
> On Fri, 29 May 2020 21:20:33 +0000
> email@example.com wrote:
> > I have not tried a newer version yet, but I will.
> > This version (20161222) is what comes with Debian buster
> > (https://packages.debian.org/buster/parallel). I suppose I was just assuming
> > that Debian had the most up-to-date version of parallel (or at least close
> > enough).
> > Obviously I was wrong after examining https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parallel/
> Debian stable tends to have some old releases, so I'm not surprised. As the
> upstream maintainer of several FOSS packages, I have mixed feelings about
> Debian because while their packagers often provide me with quality patches or
> pull-requests, they sometimes tend to delay packaging the new releases (even
> debian sid/unstable) for various reasons. See for instance:
> - https://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/wml vs.
> - https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/freecell-solver vs.
> - https://packages.debian.org/sid/fortune-mod vs.
> > ~ Evan
> > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > On Friday, May 29, 2020 5:02 PM, Hubert Kowalski firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > > your version number is ANCIENT. have you tried with newesr and see if
> > > bug's
> > > still there?
> > >
> > > > Dnia 29 maj 2020 o 19:55 email@example.com napisał(a): > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > > > I've discovered a potential bug with parallel. > > Details: > * The
> > > > > > version number: 20161222 > > * The bugid: Less than 1 byte free > >
> > > > > > *
> > > > > > The command line being run: $ time parallel --memfree 50G --retries
> > > > > > 10
> > > > > > -a commands.txt 2> parallel_stderr.txt > parallel_stdout.txt > > *
> > > > > > The
> > > > > > specific commands in "commands.txt" are calls to a Python 3 script
> > > > > > which uses the SHAP library to explain Keras deep learning models.
> > > > > > https://github.com/slundberg/shap > > * The files being read (put
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > files on a webserver if they are big) > > * Unfortunately I cannot
> > > > > > release the data files or code as they're for a private project I'm
> > > > > > working on. If need-be, I can try to replicate this error using SHAP
> > > > > > on an open dataset using a toy Python 3 script I can release. > >
> > > > > > Please let me know what you think. > > Cheers, > Evan
> Shlomi Fishhttps://www.shlomifish.org/
> Freecell Solver - https://fc-solve.shlomifish.org/
> If you ask Taylor Swift "What is the square root of 18.678?", she will answer
> "Why the hell does it matter?".
> — https://www.shlomifish.org/humour/bits/facts/Taylor-Swift/
> Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - https://shlom.in/reply .
- Re: New bug,