[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Should and Shall in standards
From: |
Miles Lott |
Subject: |
Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Should and Shall in standards |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 01:27:02 -0600 |
Should I comment? I think I shall. Must you be so obtuse?
Maybe.
Mark A Peters wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Andrew M Cohill wrote:
>
> > > It uses the words "you should not inlcude GIF's in..." it does *not*
> > > say
> > > "you cannot" or "you shall not". It says "should not", which implies
> > > an
> > > option.
> > >
> > >It is a requirement, not an option. This file always states
> > >requirements with "should not", never "cannot" or "shall not". The
> > >file uses "cannot" only for factual statements about what is possible,
> > >and never uses "shall" at all.
> >
> > I was a member of the ANSI Standards Committee HFES-200 (Software
> > Ergonomics) for more than 10 years.
> >
> > All ANSI standards use "should" and "shall" in this way:
> >
> > Should-- strongly encouraged to do it, but it is not required.
> >
> > Shall--to be in compliance with the standard, you must do it.
> >
> > We also were part of the ISO 9241 Standards Committee, and the
> > Europeans also followed this practice.
> >
>
> This was a very big issue I seen when looking back at the FSF/GNU's view
> of the GIF patent. I know what the difference is by reading a "should
> not" / "can not" or a "shall not", and there is no ambiguities by what is
> meant.
>
> Being a federal employee serving in the US military I see/write this style
> of wording everyday in software requirements/system specs. We have to
> write our SRS in a very specific manner in an effort to explicitly
> identify what we want/need from potential government contractors or other
> federal agencies.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark A Peters (Skeeter)
>
> > Andrew
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > Andrew Michael Cohill, Ph.D.
> > Director, Blackburg Electronic Village
> > address@hidden http://www.bev.net/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Phpgroupware-developers mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phpgroupware-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
--
Miles Lott - phpGroupWare
http://www.phpgroupware.org
- [Phpgroupware-developers] Module Creation without authentication, (continued)
- [Phpgroupware-developers] Module Creation without authentication, Itamar Sagie, 2002/01/21
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] The GIF issue, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 2002/01/21
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] The GIF issue, David W. Jablonski, 2002/01/21
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] The GIF issue, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 2002/01/21
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] The GIF issue, David W. Jablonski, 2002/01/21
- [Phpgroupware-developers] Whats it look like with PNG only?, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 2002/01/21
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Whats it look like with PNG only?, Bob Schader, 2002/01/21
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] The GIF issue, Richard Stallman, 2002/01/21
- [Phpgroupware-developers] Should and Shall in standards, Andrew M Cohill, 2002/01/21
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Should and Shall in standards, Mark A Peters, 2002/01/21
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Should and Shall in standards,
Miles Lott <=
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] The GIF issue, Darryl, 2002/01/21
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] The GIF issue, Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 2002/01/18
Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] The GIF issue, Peter, 2002/01/17
Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] The GIF issue, Chris Weiss, 2002/01/17
RE: [Phpgroupware-developers] The GIF issue, SidY, 2002/01/17
Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] The GIF issue, Peter, 2002/01/17
Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] The GIF issue, Norbert Bollow, 2002/01/18
Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] The GIF issue, Peter, 2002/01/18