[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Not to be impolite (2 issues, issue #1)...
From: |
Brian Jackson |
Subject: |
Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Not to be impolite (2 issues, issue #1)... |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 10:52:52 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.1 |
I agree completely. I recieve about 2500-3000 messages a week, and it just
bugs the crap out of me, when the threads are broken.
--Brian
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 09:56 am, Ron wrote:
> ISSUE #2 (of 2):
>
> Use of mailers THAT DON'T/CAN'T THREAD MESSAGES!
>
> Is there anyone left who doesn't view their messages by threads? (Speak
> up only if you attend to 20+ lists a day, please).
>
> So... HOW COULD ANY MODERN MAILER ignore THREADING? (Are we speaking
> Angelmail here?)
>
> It is my personal opinion that posting UN-THREADED replies to a mailing
> list is akin to... well, I'm too polite to mention that here, unlike the
> POLITENESS level exhibited by those who persist in posting UN-THREADED
> replies to messages on this list. It is not just that your reply is
> un-threaded, but subsequent posts are also broken if responding to your
> post.
>
> Please, fix your mailer for the sake of those who must plod through the
> post AFTER YOUR REPLY has broken the thread!
>
> If anyone else is bothered by this behavior, PLEASE POST AN I AGREE or I
> expect those abusing this standard will continue to ignore their breach
> of list etiquette.
>
> BTW, this is not the first time I have made this request on PhpGw.
what does phpgw mean again? ;)
>
> Thank you again.
>
> -Ron
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phpgroupware-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
--
OpenGFS -- http://opengfs.sourceforge.net
Home -- http://www.brianandsara.net