|
From: | Ralf Becker |
Subject: | Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Re: Standard source code header and php Documentor |
Date: | Sat, 28 Jun 2003 10:40:37 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 |
My thoughts about docs:1) I vote for inline-docs for documenting the functions and arguments. In my opinion everything else will never be very up-to-date. I completly disagree with probiz that nothing is documented in the API. I personly document everything, which is not, when I touch that class or function. Still the points of the discussion are very small, as the differences in our existing inline-doc-standard and the php-doc standard. With a view lines of customisation (far less lines as the disscussion alread took ;-) ) the existing parsers could be modified to read both.
2) General concepts should be documented in a different way! I would prefer a wiki over docbook/html as it allows more developers a simultanious access. The Inline docs should be able to be linked in at runtime. Provide macros for our wiki to do so is, beside better/more granularity in the access-control, the highest priority on my todo-list for the wiki.
3) More people should have write-rights to the wiki as it is the case at the moment. We might only want to look a view top-level pages so only some people can link in docs on that level.
Ralf -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralf Becker OUTDOOR UNLIMITED Training GmbH Telefon 0631 / 31657-0 Leibnizstraße 17 Telefax 0631 / 31657-26 D-67663 Kaiserslautern EMail address@hidden
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |