[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] status of trunk in svn
From: |
Maât |
Subject: |
Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] status of trunk in svn |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:23:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080305) |
Sigurd Nes a écrit :
> Dave Hall wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 18:53 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
>>
>>> Le jeudi 17 avril 2008 à 11:03 +0200, christian bac a écrit :
>>>
>>>> I can propose diffs from my version and the trunk, but last time I did
>>>> it, skwashd talled that there were new versions in the <<resight tree>>,
>>>> that already had the same fixes.
>>>>
>>>> When will the resight tree changes be merged to trunk.
>>>>
>> This is a question for Sigurd to answer.
>>
>>
>
> I'm glad to see that the activity is picking up, there has been very little of
> it on savanna (except for ged) lately - and the sync has mostly moved code one
> way - and the code needs manual tweaking before sync:
>
Well glad also to see that you're alive Sigurd... there have been
several posts on this list about meging evolutions from the famous
<<resight tree>>
we're all waiting for this deadlock to be solved to go on with .18
testing and stabilization.
I raised several issues on current svn trunk that need patching and i've
been answered that waiting for the merge was the best option
> 1) The resight project really need a method for quickly switch from
> developer-mode to end-user mode - suspending the notices to be printed due to
> frequently testing and demonstration of the system for non-developers.
>
> This is implemented in the resight tree as a check on the error-log-level -
> and
> it would be very nice if the community - at least for now - could allow this
> feature to survive.
>
well such a feature seems rather a good thing than a bad one
but i can't see that as enough to delay the merge we are all waiting for.
> 2) We are working on a new template - as until yesterday was temporary named
> as
> 'newdesign' - some renaming - and it should be ok to sync across.
>
that's a nice thing but there again this can be adressed as a separate thing
> 3) The structure is not identical in the two repos.
>
what is the difference ? does it make merge processus harder than i
imagine ?
Maât
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] status of trunk in svn, (continued)
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] status of trunk in svn, Sigurd Nes, 2008/04/23
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] status of trunk in svn, Dave Hall, 2008/04/23
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] status of trunk in svn, Dave Hall, 2008/04/23
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] status of trunk in svn, Sigurd Nes, 2008/04/23
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] status of trunk in svn, Dave Hall, 2008/04/23
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] status of trunk in svn, Sigurd Nes, 2008/04/24
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] status of trunk in svn, Maât, 2008/04/24
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] status of trunk in svn, Chris Weiss, 2008/04/24
- SV: [phpGroupWare-developers] status of trunk in svn, Sigurd Nes, 2008/04/24
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] status of trunk in svn, Sigurd Nes, 2008/04/24
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] status of trunk in svn,
Maât <=