[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SV: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects
From: |
Maât |
Subject: |
Re: SV: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects |
Date: |
Mon, 26 May 2008 10:52:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080504) |
Sigurd Nes a écrit :
Lol - it's nice to start the day with a joke :)
thanks
I'm very grateful for your kind offer
Could you BOTH , please, please, stop duelling like this ?
We need to move, we need to produce an alpha and then betas and
hopefully a stable release
We need to show the world that phpgw is not dead
We need to give the world a nice phpgw and we need to let the world know
that things are evolving
We need to attract new contributors, and for that we also need to set up
a fun-to-code atmosphere
Could you stop just five minutes this childish game and try to find a
win-win solution for everybody ?
What's wrong with the idea of accepting TEMPORARILY sigurd patch for
branching and alpha tag then working all together to have this feature
cleaned for first beta tag ?
What's wrong with the idea of letting Sigurd give an estimation of the
time he would need instead of deciding for him ?
Do you BOTH really prefer a loose-loose solution ?
Sigurd : Could you accept, if the option i'm pleading for is choosen, to
review and fix in a reasonable time the db cloning in property so that
it complies with demanded quality criterias ? (ie : db cloning removed
or remains exceptional)
Dave : Could you try to soften a little bit your team management
communication and give people a chance to prove their good will ?
How can you all hope to see phpgw gain new contributors and new audience
if nobody want to make an effort to improve all that need to be improved ?
We can see things change and improve... but the first requirement to see
that happen is to want it !
sorry regards,
Maât
- RE: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects, (continued)
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects, Maât, 2008/05/24
- RE: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects, Sigurd Nes, 2008/05/24
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects, Maât, 2008/05/24
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects, Dave Hall, 2008/05/24
- RE: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects, Sigurd Nes, 2008/05/25
- RE: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects, Sigurd Nes, 2008/05/25
- RE: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects, Dave Hall, 2008/05/25
- SV: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects, Sigurd Nes, 2008/05/26
- Re: SV: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects,
Maât <=
- Re: SV: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects, Dave Hall, 2008/05/26
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] New developers (Was: Nested db-objects), Alan Langford, 2008/05/26
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] New developers (Was: Nested db-objects), Sigurd Nes, 2008/05/26
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] New developers (Was: Nested db-objects), Chris Weiss, 2008/05/26
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] New developers (Was: Nested db-objects), Alan Langford, 2008/05/26
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] New developers (Was: Nested db-objects), Sigurd Nes, 2008/05/27
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] Be funny ... (was: New developers (Was: Nested db-objects)), Benoit Hamet, 2008/05/27
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects, Dr. Christian Böttger, 2008/05/23
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects, Maât, 2008/05/23
- Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] Nested db-objects, Dr. Christian Böttger, 2008/05/23